|
課程名稱 |
鄉村發展與資源規劃:政治經濟與政治生態的視野
Rural Development and Resource Planning: Political Economy/Ecology Approach |
|
開課學期 |
109-2 |
|
授課對象 |
工學院 建築與城鄉研究所 |
|
授課教師 |
王冠棋 |
|
課號 |
BP7228 |
|
課程識別碼 |
544 M4940 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
3.0 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
選修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期二A,B,C(18:25~21:05) |
|
上課地點 |
工綜313 |
|
備註 |
總人數上限：25人 |
|
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1092BP7228_ |
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
有鑑於過去十年全球農業發展已經成為學術研究的重要課題，本課程承襲建築與城鄉研究所對於全球政治經濟理論與實踐的關懷，一方面介紹鄉村發展與資源規劃相關研究的淵源與趨勢，另一方面透過政治經濟學與政治生態學取徑，幫助修課者建立相關議題的理論視野，並將理論與概念工具活用到經驗分析，再進一步將研究成果發表到國內外期刊。
This course is a graduate seminar that examines key concepts, major approaches and current debates that pertain to rural development and resource planning. It examines how concepts and theories of development and environment have been produced, maintained, used, and challenged in different world economies. In the first part of the semester we examine the rise and fall of dominant development paradigms and how they shaped different ideas concerning the environment and the management of natural resources. In viewing development as a contested process operating at multiple levels of economy and society, the course seeks to provide a set of analytical tools that is both critical and constructive.
Questions to be addressed include:
1. How and why specific ideas become hegemonic in particular historical conjunctures, while other ideas were discounted?
2. How did these ideas translate into natural resource and agriculture policy and practice in different regions of the world?
3. What are the processes by which dominant paradigms have been undermined?
The second part of the course examines current and emerging debates in empirical research on nature and resource development, addressing issues of resource struggles, the politics of knowledge systems, and socio-political movements that shape governing institutions for rural development. The ultimate goal of this course is to help students develop their conceptual toolkit for future research on rural development and resource planning.
|
|
課程目標 |
本課程在於令修課者
1. 掌握鄉村發展與資源規劃理論與概念的淵源。
2. 通過全球個案閱讀與討論，掌握相關問題分析與規劃的能力。
3. 建立鄉村發展與資源規劃理論分析的視野，並將研究發表在中外期刊。
|
|
課程要求 |
Class presentation: Except week 1, 15, and 17. Every week students (as a 2 people group or by consent) will be responsible for presenting the meta message of each reading, summarizing the main issues and raising questions (at least three questions), topics of interest and in general, running the discussion. Power points and/or handouts may be used to display the presentations. The presenters must come to class with a clear-cut plan to stimulate discussion, moderate it, and if necessary organize screening of relevant documentaries, small group discussions or other activities.
Reaction paper: Each student must write “3,” 2-page reaction papers, two for section one (before week 9), one for section two (after week 9, 1-inch margin on all sides, font size not less than 11.5, and line spacing of 1.5). The reaction papers should synthesize the readings for the coming week, critically evaluate them, and provide reactions or opinions of the student; it should not be a mere compilation of facts from the readings. The reaction papers must be handed in before the class begins. In other words, the papers must be handed in before the class starts discussing the readings for which the student has written his/her reactions. The student must react to all the readings assigned for those specific 3 weeks that she/he chooses.
End term essay: You will need to address a topic that we have introduced from week 9 in an essay of 5 pages. The essay is expected to particularly highlight the approach’s history, major debates, and your critiques. You may also decide to write a term paper by consent. You will turn in the final paper in class in the last day of the class.
Readings assigned might change in accord with participants’ interests.
Please note that late submission of assignments will not be accepted and there will be no makeup exams. In case you are unavailable on a day on which an assignment is due, then please submit the same a day or two earlier according to your convenience.
Attendance in class is mandatory.
|
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
|
|
指定閱讀 |
Bernstein, H. 2010. Class Dynamics of Agrarian Change. Halifax NS: Fernwood |
|
參考書目 |
Adams., W.M. 1995. Green development theory? Environmentalism and sustainable development. Power of Development. London and New York: Routledge: 57-99.
Andreucci, D., García-Lamarca M., Wedekind J. and Swyngedouw E. 2017. Value grabbing: A political ecology of rent, Capitalism Nature Socialism, 28 (3): 28-47.
Arboleda, M. 2020. Towards an agrarian question of circulation: Walmart's expansion in Chile and the agrarian political economy of supply chain capitalism. Journal of Agrarian Change.
Borras JR, S.M. and Franco, J.C. 2012. Global land grabbing and trajectories of agrarian change: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Agrarian Change 12: 34-59.
Bridge, G. 2006. “Exploiting: Power, colonialism and resource economies”. In Companion Encyclopedia of Geography, Edited by: Douglas, I., Huggett, R. and Robinson, M. 867–86. London: Routledge.
Bridge, G. 2008. Global production networks and the extractive sector: Governing resource-based development. Journal of Economic Geography 8: 389-419.
Bridge, G. 2011. Resource geographies I: making carbon economies, old and new. Progress in Human Geography 35(6): 820–834.
Christophers, B. 2018. The New Enclosure: The Appropriation of Public Land in Neoliberal Britain. Introduction and Ch1. London: Verso.
Cowen, D. 2010. A geography of logistics: Market authority and the security of supply chains. Annals for the Association of American Geographers 100(3): 1-21.
Freidberg, S. 2013. Calculating sustainability in supply chain capitalism. Economy and Society 42 (4): 571-596.
Friedmann, H. 2016. Commentary: Food regime analysis and agrarian questions: widening the conversation. The Journal of Peasant Studies. 43 (3): 671-692.
Foster, J. 1999. Marx's theory of metabolic rift: Classical foundations for environmental sociology. American Journal of Sociology 105(2): 366-405.
Guthman, J. 2011. Bodies and accumulation: Revisiting labour in the ‘Production of Nature’. New Political Economy 16 (2): 233-238.
Hall, D. 2019. National food security through corporate globalization: Japanese strategies in the global grain trade since the 2007–8 Food Crisis. The Journal of Peasant Studies.
Harvey, D. 1974. Population, resources, and the ideology of science, Economic Geography 50, pp. 256-277.
Harvey, D. 2003. The New Imperialism. Chapter 1 (pp. 1-25). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Homer-Dixon, T. F. 2001. Environment, Scarcity, and Violence. Chapters 2, 3 and 4. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Kay, K. 2017. Rural rentierism and the financial enclosure of Maine's open lands tradition, Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 107 (6): 1407-1423.
Karpouzoglou, T. and Vij, S. 2017. Waterscape: a perspective for understanding the contested geography of water. WIREs Water (4): e1210.
Loftus, A. 2020. Political ecology II: Whither the state? Progress in Human Geography, 44(1), 139–149.
Malthus, T. 1998 (1798). An Essay on the Principle of Population, Chapters 1 through 7. Electronic Scholarly Publishing Projec.
Marx, K. 1887. Capital Volume I.
Marx, K. 1894. Capital Volume III.
McMichael P. 2009. A food regime genealogy. The Journal of Peasant Studies. 36 (1): 139-169.
McMichael P. 2020. Does China’s “Going Out” strategy prefigure a new food regime?’ The Journal of Peasant Studies. 47 (1): 116-54.
Moore, J. 2017. Metabolic rift or metabolic shift? Dialectics, nature, and the world-historical method. Theory and Society 46: 285-318.
Moore, J. 2017. The Capitalocene, Part I: On the nature and origins of our ecological crisis, The Journal of Peasant Studies 44 (3): 594-630.
Mutersbaugh, T., Klooster, D., Renard, M-C., and Taylor., Peter 2005. Certifying rural spaces: Quality-certified products and rural governance. Journal of Rural Studies 21(4): 381-388.
Napoletano, B.M., Foster, J.B., Clark, B., Urquijo, P.S., McCall, M.K. & Paneque-Gálvez, J. 2019. Making space in critical environmental geography for the metabolic rift. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109 (6): 1811-1828.
Oliveira, G. L. T. and Schneider, M. 2016. The politics of flexing soybeans: China, Brazil and global agroindustrial restructuring. The Journal of Peasant Studies 43 (1): 167-194.
Peet, R. 2009. Ten pages that changed the world: Deconstructing Ricardo. Human Geography 2(1): 81-95.
Prudham, S. 2007. The fictions of autonomous invention: Accumulation by dispossession, commodification and life patents in Canada. Antipode 39 (3): 406-429.
Ribot, J. C., and N. L. Peluso. 2003. A theory of access. Rural Sociology 68 (2):153–81.
Ricardo, D. 1817 and 1823. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation.
Schneider, M. 2014. Developing the meat grab. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (4): 613-633.
Smith, A. 1776. The Wealth of Nations.
Weis, T. 2013. The meat of the global food crisis. The Journal of Peasant Studies 40 (1): 65-85.
Watts, M. 2004. Resource curse? governmentality, oil and power in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Geopolitics. 9 (1): 50-80.
|
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
|
第1週 |
2/23 |
便宜的自然？農業發展的全球政治生態視野
Introduction: Cheap nature? The world ecology of agrarian development |
|
第2週 |
3/02 |
反思古典政治經濟學對於自然資源與農業的分析架構
Classical political economy of resource and agriculture, and reflections |
|
第3週 |
3/09 |
馬爾薩司的深遠影響
The specter of Malthus |
|
第4週 |
3/16 |
馬克斯對於古典取徑的批判
Marx’s critique |
|
第5週 |
3/23 |
關於原始積累的辦論
Accumulation by dispossession |
|
第6週 |
3/30 |
關於鄉村發展的重新概念化
Re-conceptualizing rural development in the contemporary world |
|
第7週 |
4/06 |
溫書假
Spring Break |
|
第8週 |
4/13 |
鄉村發展：綠色發展？
Branches of Rural Development (green development?) |
|
第9週 |
4/20 |
鄉村發展：照護與生存
Branches of Rural Development (care and livelihood) |
|
第10週 |
4/27 |
食物政權
The Food Regime |
|
第11週 |
5/04 |
資源與發展
The Resource Based Development |
|
第12週 |
5/11 |
全球土地掠奪
Global Land Grab |
|
第13週 |
5/18 |
地租與金融化的自然
Rent and Financial Nature |
|
第14週 |
5/25 |
代謝斷裂
Metabolic Rift
|
|
第15週 |
6/01 |
東亞鄉村發展與發展型國家
Rural development and developmental state in East Asia |
|
第16週 |
6/08 |
「水景」作為研究取徑（演講與討論）
Waterscape
|
|
第17週 |
6/15 |
晚近鄉村發展與資源規劃相關學術發表趨勢
Current trend of academic publication in rural development and resource planning |
|